Cold War targeting of U.S. military sites and cities for nuclear destruction

Notice how foreign/Soviet/Communist/Chinese nuclear targeting focused on:

NYC/New England/Boston region

New Jersey/Naval Weapons Station-Earle, NJ (which housed nuclear weapons for US Naval craft)

Norfolk, Va., for obvious reasons

San Diego - not surprising, with the amount of the US Naval Fleet based there

And lastly, just a very, very few Midwest locations, ie, Minot ND, Omaha NE, etc.  Very interesting, considering the number of heavily fortified ICMB silos located within.

NIKE Missile Information Part 5

Here is the video from Bell System (currently AT&T) on the NIKE missile system:

NIKE Hercules Missile Intercept - U.S. Army Proving Ground

NIKE Hercules Missile Defense

This is a new research project I am undertaking, and will be posting frequent blogs and tweets regarding  my findings.  There are a tremendous amount of resources out there, especially since FOIA has opened up government records regarding the NIKE project.

The entire family of NIKE missiles deployed by the U.S. Army during the Cold War.

From Prof. Donald E. Bender's very informative website, here is a brief overview of the NIKE program:

Nike, named for the mythical Greek goddess of victory, was the name given to a program which ultimately produced the world's first successful, widely-deployed, guided surface-to-air missile system. Planning for Nike was begun during the last months of the Second World War when the U.S. Army realized that conventional anti-aircraft artillery would not be able to provide an adequate defense against the fast, high-flying and maneuverable jet aircraft which were being introduced into service, particularly by the Germans.

During 1945, Bell Telephone Laboratories produced the "AAGM (Anti Aircraft Guided Missile) Report" in which the concept of the Nike system were first outlined. The Report envisioned a two-stage, supersonic missile which could be guided to its target by means of ground-based radar and computer systems. This type of system is known as a "command" guidance system. The main advantage over conventional anti-aircraft artillery was that the Nike missile could be continuously guided to intercept an aircraft, in spite of any evasive actions taken by its pilot. By contrast, the projectiles fired by conventional anti-aircraft artillery (such as 90mm and 120mm guns) followed a predetermined, ballistic trajectory which could not be altered after firing.

The Nike Mission

During the first decade of the Cold War, the Soviet Union began to develop a series of long-range bomber aircraft, capable of reaching targets within the continental United States. The potential threat posed by such aircraft became much more serious when, in 1949, the Russians exploded their first atomic bomb.

The perception that the Soviet Union might be capable of constructing a sizable fleet of long-range, nuclear-armed bomber aircraft capable of reaching the continental United States provided motivation to rapidly develop and deploy the Nike system to defend major U.S. population centers and other vital targets. The outbreak of hostilities in Korea, provided a further impetus to this deployment.

The mission of Nike within the continental U.S was to act as a "last ditch" line of air defense for selected areas. The Nike system would have been utilized in the event that the Air Force's long-range fighter-interceptor aircraft had failed to destroy any attacking bombers at a greater distance from their intended targets.

Nike Deployment

Within the continental United States, Nike missile sites were constructed in defensive "rings" surrounding major urban and industrial areas. Additional Nike sites protected key Strategic Air Command bases and other sensitive installations, such as the nuclear facilities at Hanford, Washington. Sites were located on government-owned property where this was available (for example, on military bases). However, much real estate needed to be acquired in order to construct sufficient bases to provide an adequate defense. This was a sometimes difficult and contentious process. Often, the federal government had to go to court in order to obtain the property needed for such sites.

The exact number of Nike sites constructed within a particular "defense area" varied depending upon many factors. The New York Defense Area -- one of the largest in the nation -- was defended at one time by nearly twenty individual Nike installations. Due to the relatively short range of the original Nike missile, the Nike "Ajax", many bases were located relatively close to the center of the areas they protected. Frequently, they were located within heavily populated areas.

Nike Ajax missiles first became operational at Fort Meade, Maryland, during December, 1953. Dozens of Nike sites were subsequently constructed at locations all across the continental United States during the mid fifties and early sixties. Roughly 250 sites were constructed during this period. Nike missiles were also deployed overseas with U.S. forces in Europe and Asia, by the armed forces of many NATO nations (Germany, France, Denmark, Italy, Belgium, Norway, the Netherlands, Greece and Turkey), and by U.S. allies in Asia (Japan, South Korea, and Taiwan).

**Bender, Donald E.  http://alpha.fdu.edu/~bender/N-view.html

Ella Baker: Freedom Bound

Born in Norfolk, Virginia in 1903, Ella Josephine Baker died 83 years to the day of her birth. Despite the fact that as a woman, she was expected by black ministers and community leaders to remain quietly in the shadows, Baker refused to sit idly by while the "men with clay feet" led the civil rights movement. No doubt, the significance of the day of her passing would not be lost on a firebrand such as Baker, who was never content to simply sit back in the shadows.
As a young child, Ella and her family moved from Norfolk to rural North Carolina where she spent a great deal of time with her grandmother, who related to her the tales of the horrible life on the plantation she grew up on. It was not so much the brutality or horrid treatment that moved Ella so. Rather, it was her grandmother's recounting of the severe beating received at the hands of her master when she refused to marry a man the master tried to force upon her. As such a young girl, Ella was confused and hurt at hearing the tale, but deep within her belly a fire began to burn.
Hearing her grandmother's story would play a formative role in Baker's life, and thrust her into what would eventually become not only a prominent role in the nascent civil rights movement, but would also earn her a place in history amongst the likes of Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr., and W.E.B. du Bois. For many years, the story of Ella Baker would falsely characterize her as a domineering, out-of-control woman. However, "Miss Baker," as those who respected her referred to her, would help to shape, mentor, and take as her protégés many of the very same men who would go on to be recognized as the leaders of the civil rights movement. For that role she is rightfully known as the "Mother of the Civil Rights Movement."
Baker believed in a type of familial collectivism; the community group exists, she said, without a social hierarchy, and yet everyone shares food, housing, child rearing and tools to help provide for all of their neighbors around them. She carried this into her first role with the NAACP in 1938, where she immediately challenged the presumptuousness of the all-male, black clergymen who were certainly not keen on females in leadership roles. When Baker graduated valedictorian from Shaw College in Raleigh, North Carolina, it was the normative standard that young black women were either housemaids; or else, with a college degree, school teachers. She opted instead to head to New York City, as was characteristic of her hard-charging spirit, and.
Consequently, Baker fashioned her mentorship style around encouraging a group-centered leadership, rather than grooming a single individual to lead. This characterized her radical, democratic vision, which rejected hierarchical constructs that would relegate women to subservient positions. Later on through the years, critics would decry her for this, claiming that it was her way of speaking pejoratively of Dr. King and his leadership style. As the quintessential organizer, she promulgated her collectivist beliefs at each and every organization she worked for or helped to found, arousing the ire of more than a few people.
Nonetheless, her audaciousness and tenacity led her to become, in 1943, the first female regional executive for the NAACP. Just a few short years later, Ella Jo Baker would go on in 1957 to help Dr. King found the Southern Christian Leadership Conference, better known as SCLC. In 1960, she was the impetus behind the formation of the Student Nonviolent Coordinating Commission (SNCC).
For Ella Baker, the truly catalyzing moment in her life began with the "year-long bus boycott in Montgomery, in which she saw the potential for the mass movement that had always been her dream." And again, Baker would incite conflict with the male ministerial set, who found it difficult to deal with a powerful woman such as she. Moreover, individuals such as Dr. King took affront to Ella Baker's mantra of "group-centered leadership rather than leader-centered group." Baker worried a great deal that a "cult of personality" was forming around Dr. Martin Luther King, which at times put the two of them at loggerheads. One such example was Baker's grassroots appeal to send people out door-to-door, and attempt to bring as many people into the fold as possible. Baker "urged the organization to recruit more low-income members by, for example, sending organizers into pool rooms and taverns; her experience had been that some would join up just out of sheer surprise."

It was her formation of the Student Nonviolent Coordinating Committee that was her signature achievement. SNCC was an offshoot organization for students who were organizing at the grassroots, local level, protesting with sit-in's at lunch counters and small, peaceful protests. Under Baker's tutelage, she infused her brand of molding and forming a democratic organization. Realizing that many of the energetic and eager college students she was organizing did not have much in the way of training or leadership experience, Baker took this opportunity to start with a tabula rasa, instilling her brand of collectivist ideology into this new organization.
Nevertheless, Ella Baker utilized her preferred style of participatory democracy, with everyone assuming group leadership, rather than a single leader in the top role. Baker also made it a point to keep SNCC firmly a student-run organization, out of the grasp of SCLC and the NAACP's dictums. Regardless of any of her past affiliations or employment with those two organizations, Baker was palpably displeased with them and was determined not to let the male clergymen subvert the new group from the broader and more ambitious goals she was guiding it towards.

JAMES ALFRED MOLNAR
Graduate School of Arts & Science
Wake Forest University

http://www.CharlestonBattlefields.com
http://www.CharlestonGraveyards.com
http://www.facebook.com/charlestongraveyards

Text follow chasbattles to 40404 in the United States to follow CharlestonBattlefields.com on twitter!

Article Source: http://EzineArticles.com/?expert=James_A_Molnar

America: True Democracy, or Beholden to Power Brokers?

American identity is a composite of both the history provided in the archival record, and the stories authored by writers that now make up the corpus of American literature over the past three centuries. However, those in power in America were primarily the ones whose stories concretized the national memory that we now acknowledge to be our unique idea - the one that gives us "Americanness." Those who have been in power in America for two and a half centuries have sought - and often succeeded - in crafting the legislature to suit their desires.

Power is obtained through two primary ways: the accumulation of wealth (be it through cash or landholding); or by force, which includes or implies the threat of death.

This paper will seek to develop the relationship by which wealthy - and most often landed - elites have leveraged this to empower themselves in ways that allow them to subjugate certain classes, to control the flow of information in various media, and explore how this has remained the status quo throughout much of United States' history. Moreover, we will explore contemporary America and how these "upper casters" as I will term them, continue doing so to this day. Lastly, we will analyze how this affects and shapes American identity both within - and how our national character is viewed from without.

TO READ THE FULL ARTICLE, PLEASE CLICK HERE:
Article Source: http://EzineArticles.com/6801385

Jacksonian Politics in America

Though the emergence of distinct political parties in American politics predated the Jacksonian era by forty years or more, the election of a populist president like Andrew Jackson was arguably the catalyzing moment for the wealthy elites of America. Their response - the formation of the Whig party - was set to counteract Jackson's actions and help to preserve this minority's majority in the national political scene.

How could politics be considered fair in this period of American history when, for example, nearly one-fifth of the legislators came from the elite power centers such as Connecticut, while the state represented something on the order of one-twentieth of the nation's population? With his belief in the fair and equanimious redistribution of wealth in American society, Brinkley points out how Jackson ordered the redistribution of the federal surplus to all of the states in the nation. Jackson espoused a great deal of the same social and political mores of liberals in America today. These particular beliefs, coupled with Jackson's actions, would incite not only the creation of the Whig Party, but foment the development of a number of political institutions and mechanisms that exist even today, such as the party convention system. His presidency would have long-standing implications.

The foundation of the Whig party made the distinctions between they and the Democrats more and more obvious. In his writings de Toqueville claims that one of the few protections against the "tyranny of the majority" is the right of political association. We see such a right exercised in the massing of individuals in the form of political parties. "The right of political associations," wrote de Toqueville, "[enabled] the supporters of an opinion to unite in electoral colleges and appoint delegates to represent them in a central assembly... This is properly speaking the representative system applied to one party." With his power consolidated quite well, Jackson was free to deftly make executive decisions that advanced his agenda, while agitating the political and social elites of both the Northern power centers as well as the landed, elite Southern planters. Interestingly enough, Jackson and his Democrats appealed to individuals out West as they sought opportunities to better themselves through land acquisitions; less affluent Northerners, and even Southerner planters who wanted less government intrusion. This stands in stark contraposition to the Democratic party of today, whose power base is increasingly centered outside the Southern United States, which up until a few decades ago was overwhelmingly Democratic in affiliation.

TO READ THE COMPLETE ARTICLE (FREE, NO REGISTRATION REQUIRED), CLICK HERE:

http://EzineArticles.com/6801340

Text follow chasbattles to 40404 in the United States to follow CharlestonBattlefields.com on twitter!

Murder in Money: The Death of Emmett Till As Catalyst for the Civil Rights Movement

Money. Rural Mississippi, 1954. A whistle. Then a murder. This, however, was not a murder over money, but rather in Money, a tiny one-shop town, whose primary inhabitants were sharecroppers, a throwback to antebellum times. That general store was owned by the Bryant family, whose owners included twenty-one year old Carolyn Bryant, a former beauty queen whose good looks were well-known around those parts.

It was that fateful day, when a fourteen year old boy from Chicago named Emmett Till came down to spend a few weeks visiting with relatives. He stayed along with several of his cousins at his great-uncle Mose "Preacher" Wright's home, in a nearby section of town exclusively populated by blacks. Unbeknownst to young Emmett, there was an unwritten "code" in rural Mississippi: it was well known in the Jim Crow South that there were certain things a black male - be it a young child, or an adult man - just did not do. The list was long, and extensive. His mother, Mamie Till Bradley, warned him before he boarded the train from Illinois that such "black codes" still existed. In fact, she feared a great deal for her son's safety, and was reticent to even allow him to Mississippi.

Nonetheless, the young Till was insistent, and as was unsurprising to those who knew him, he exuded a confidence in adolescence that made him fearless. However, street smarts in Chicago would only get a young black man so far in rural Money. Though 700 miles apart geographically, the two locales were more like a million miles apart sociologically, racially, and culturally.

There were unspoken rules Emmett would need to acquaint himself with that were prevalent throughout the South at this time, and most black men were acquiescent, if not downright submissive to the white race's presupposed dominance

TO READ THE FULL ARTICLE (FREE, NO REGISTRATION REQUIRED):
Article Source: http://EzineArticles.com/7138680

Charleston and James Island: Battlefields and Artillery Emplacements

View James Island Battlefield and Defenses in a larger map

Dred Scott: The Implications of this SCOTUS Decision as a Causative Factor for the United States Civil War

The ramifications of the Dred Scott decision were broad and wide. Chief Justice Taney's interpretation of the Constitutionality of whether Scott should be allowed manumission not only stirred up and concretized abolitionist sentiment, but it would furthermore have broad implications on Lincoln's decision to issue a proclamation of Emancipation, as well.

Some argue that the case in and of itself was frivolous in nature; conjured up by some lawyers to gain notoriety, or wealthy abolitionists seeking to force a SCOTUS decision in 1857 that would ultimately decide the issue of slavery's legality. This was a propitiating factor in the creation of the Republican party as a direct contradiction to the Democratic party of the time; and also ultimately led to Lincoln's victory in the election of 1860. This, of course, caused seven states to secede by the time of his inauguration, setting in motion an irrevocable course towards war.

What, specifically, was it about Taney's decision that caused so much furor? For one thing, it further exacerbated the schism between North and South. Sectional tensions were inflamed as the Scott v. Sanford decision nullified the Missouri Compromise, thereby opening the doors to possible slavery in annexed territory, and for the first time since Marbury v. Madison, undoing a piece of congressional legislation. This decision also undid the concept of "Once Free Always Free," a tenet used as justification for Scott's release; and ultimately, it returned Scott to slavery. The decision also went further by denying citizenship -- and abnegating most rights -- of slaves. The decision, as it was handed down, protected the owner of chattel from seizure under the Due Process clause of the U.S. Constitution.

TO CONTINUE READING THE FULL ARTICLE, PLEASE CLICK THE FOLLOWING LINK:
Article Source: http://EzineArticles.com/6800185

The Role of African Americans in the Civil war

One would be remiss to neglect the absolute importance that African Americans played throughout the course of the Civil War, both North and South. From the war's outset, Southern Confederate leadership recognized their value as laborers, hard workers, and the unquestionable impressment into service they could leverage.

Nevertheless, Northern whites and Southern whites held widely disparate views of the role that these black men should play. For Southerners, there was no question that these black men would never be armed. "In the eyes of Southern whites, free blacks were the least trustworthy and most unessential segment of Southern society, and as the sectional controversy became more critical, whites began to restrict their limited freedom"(Glatthaar, 3). For Northern whites, the sentiment was that black men should not be used whatsoever, despite the fact that thousands of free black men were clamoring all across the Union at recruitment centers, courthouses and town halls offering up their services. To the Northern blacks, this would afford them opportunity to prove their worth, and essentially validate their freedom.

From the executive on down, Northern feelings varied greatly: Lincoln, at first, did not wish for the black men to join the armed forces. Prominent abolitionists such as Frederick Douglass clamored for the opportunity for black men to prove their mettle. And Union commanders such as General Butler would take it upon themselves to do things such as his issuance of General Order #3. Further complicating matters were the confiscation acts, which thus dictated that slaves could be held as contraband if they escaped Southern lines and came to the Union lines for succor. Despite all of this, the idea of arming the black man was far more progressive than either side wished to entertain during the initial phases of the Civil War.

As the war progressed, a movement began to form an all-black regiment under the encouragement of several prominent Massachusetts individuals and statesmen, such as the governor as well as Frederick Douglass, who himself volunteered two of his sons to fight in it. Chosen to lead this unit was a young Harvard graduate, Colonel Robert Gould Shaw, scion of a prominent and wealthy Massachusetts family. His selection could not have been more fortuitous. At first reticent to take on the role, Shaw felt that the "negro would be difficult to train," and was quite worried about what this would do to his career. Simultaneously, Lee and Davis of the Confederacy had issued their order that any black troops fighting for the Union army would not only be confiscated and enslaved by the South, but that their white commanders would summarily be executed. Thus this was a difficult time for all involved.

Nevertheless, Shaw (then a captain) tacitly agreed to take the assignment, and was promoted as regimental Colonel of what was designated the 54th Massachusetts Regiment. They began to muster in Readsville, Massachusetts, and the response was overwhelming; so much so that the 55th Massachusetts would be formed shortly thereafter to accommodate all of the willing conscripts. Under the tutelage of Sergeant Major Forbes - a rough and tumble Irishman - the grueling process of training began. Shaw himself remarked in a letter to his sister back in Boston that he found it remarkable how quickly the men learned and, in many instances, were superior in many facets to the white soldiers he had trained previously. This would prepare them for their first engagement, the Battle of Grimball's Landing, a spit of land on the plantation of Solomon Legare adjacent to James Island, South Carolina. An inauspicious, inhospitable and malarial region of the Lowcountry, Shaw's men would prove their mettle for the first time on July 16, 1863, as they ferried up the Stono River to disembark on Sol Legare Island. Shaw led his men, under the auspices of Union General Alfred Terry, to reconnoiter a Confederate artillery battery under the command of General Johnson Hagood. Though a short skirmish, the 54th Regt. did not turn tail and flee, as many Northern pundits predicted would happen. Rather, they proved themselves a worthy adversary and, though Union casualties were greater than the Confederate's, nevertheless forced the rebels to withdraw back towards the neighborhood of Secessionville as well as towards Battery Wagner, an as yet incomplete fort built in the sands of nearby Morris Island. This would be the prelude for a major conflict to come.

Though incomplete, Fort Wagner (as the battery was known) was considered to be one of the most formidable beachheads ever constructed in the United States Civil War. The battle was, in effect, two entirely separate engagements: the first took place prior to the Battle of Sol Legare, on July 11, 1863. The real battle for the 54th Massachusetts Regt. to cut their teeth came later on July 18, 1863 - two days after the skirmish on Mr. Legare's plantation. With Col. Shaw leading the charge up the ramparts, the 54th Mass. proved fallacious the Northern belief that blacks were inferior fighters. Quite the contrary: though the casualties were heavy, and the losses bloody, the 54th. Mass. proved itself a worthy adversary, both bold and brave. Despite this, Col. Shaw would be lost as he attempted to scale the parapet, and would disrespectfully be thrown into a mass grave on Shute's Folly (present-day Folly Beach), apparently with the bodies of his dead Massachusetts soldiers atop him, a desecration the Southerners felt was befitting any man who would command African Americans into battle. The engagement would go on until September before the South would finally capitulate; however, the North's Pyrrhic victory served as impetus for an influx of new black recruits to the Union army, and renewed the vigor of Northern whites to the Union cause. The victory would also set the stage for Union artillery to gain a foothold for the future shelling of downtown Charleston.

Black soldiers of the Union Army removing burying war dead.

In addition to the respect that African American soldiers were now receiving by virtue of their fighting valiantly for the Union Army was their eagerness to learn and their ability to hungrily absorb knowledge. The various regiments of colored troops set up both formal and informal educational programs for their soldiers, and this enabled the men not only to uplift themselves, but also to produce a smarter, better warrior. The implications of education on the military indoctrination process are obvious; and the benefits were certainly evident. Heretofore the simple act of educating blacks was considered a crime; now, its benefits recognizable, it was fostered and encouraged. Individuals such as Edwin Pierce of Boston found the former slave troops to be "apt pupils, quick to grasp at the opportunity to learn"(Cornish, 369).

Young black children on the portico of the Circular Congregational Church, Charleston, 1865.

Following the cessation of conflict, black troops played an incongruous role that often appeared to be retributive towards the former rebels: as martial patrol and guards in cities such as Savannah and Charleston, and as local overseers of the Freedmen's Bureau in cities all over the South. For many of their former masters, this was seen as an especially personal affront, yet was one that the African American soldiers from the North relished. As to be expected, conflict arose at various points in the postbellum years which some have - correctly or incorrectly - attributed as a reason for the prolonged regression of civil rights that led into the Jim Crow era.

Nevertheless, the positive contributions and value the African Americans played in helping secure a Northern victory can not be downplayed. The manpower they provided; the skilled labor they brought to bear; and their mental and military acuity were immeasurable. The shear number of these men alone undoubtedly marked a tipping point for the North, especially when juxtaposed to the racist attitudes of the Southern leadership, who refused to utilize this terrific resource.

JAMES ALFRED MOLNAR
Graduate School of Arts & Science Wake Forest University

http://www.CharlestonGraveyards.com
http://www.CharlestonBattlefields.com
http://www.facebook.com/charlestongraveyards
molnja7@wfu.edu

Article Source: http://EzineArticles.com/?expert=James_A_Molnar

Text follow chasbattles to 40404 in the United States to follow CharlestonBattlefields.com on twitter!

SECESSIONVILLE: The Siege of Charleston, 1862-3

The campaign to take the pivotal city of Charleston began with an initial assault on the Tower Battery located in Secessionville, a village of Charleston located on James Island. It is still not known with certainty to this day if the name "Secessionville" arose as a result of the outbreak of the War Between the States, or if it referred to an earlier conflict in the 1850s regarding a revolt by planters in this village who wished to "secede" from the City of Charleston over tax grievances. Regardless, Charleston - the birthplace of secession - was considered the hotbed of rebellion; leveling this city en route to its surrender would be a very symbolic act of retribution by the Federal forces and a moral victory for the Union. The proximity of the Tower Battery, later to be renamed Fort Lamar after its commander Colonel Lamar, was an essential asset to gaining unfettered sightlines for Union artillery to begin shelling the stately homes of Charleston's peninsula.

Preparations for this siege campaign began in earnest in early 1862. The newly-assigned Confederate General Robert E. Lee, outmanned and outgunned by Union naval forces, decided to "adopt a strategy of inland defense in an attempt to lure the Northerners from their powerful naval guns". However, Lee was transfixed by his desire to protect Charleston and Savannah, as well. His engineers tirelessly toiled to fortify both cities with gun emplacements, reinforced batteries and earthworks, and recruited local townsmen in both cities to provide an additional militia force for defense.

Accordingly, Confederate Major General John Pemberton began dismantling and repositioning Confederate guns from areas in close proximity over to Charleston, following Lee's mandate. Pemberton "ordered 1st District Commander Colonel Arthur M. Manigault to dismantle the Georgetown, South Carolina batteries up the coast from Charleston and ship the guns and attendant troops to the latter." The South Carolina military liaison, Brigadier General States Rights Gist, worked concurrently "to smooth relations between the army and civilian leaders" following this bold repurposing of armaments and ordnance, as everyone from South Carolina Governor Pickens to the mayor of Charleston were incensed."

MAP OF CHARLESTON, JAMES ISLAND, AND HARBOR DEFENSES

On the Federal side of the battle lines, General David Hunter was firmly in command. A "darling of the Radical Republicans, [Hunter] soon found himself in command of the Union forces that made up the Department of the South." "He and his chief subordinate, Henry Benham, were recent arrivals" to the South Carolina theater. Benham commanded 6,500 troops, comprised of units from the 8th Michigan, 3rd New Hampshire, 7th Connecticut, 28th Massachusetts, and 79th New York "Highlanders," all preparing for assault on the southern flank of the Confederate stronghold on James Island.

Confederate troops were busily making preparations to remove the bulk of emplacements on Cole Island and Battery Island, a group of barrier islands to the Southern and Eastern portions of James Island. "Clement Stevens took a week to dismantle the 17 guns on Coles and the two pieces on Battery Island. With the guns' transfer from Stono Inlet... three companies of artillerymen took up posts in the new works near Elliot's Cut." While all of this was taking place, four artillery pieces were loaded onto the Confederate transport vessel Planter, and were to be delivered to Fort Ripley in the center of Charleston Harbor. An industrious and clever African-American aboard the vessel and who served as the pilot, Robert Smalls, led "a crew of five black men" aboard ship. This would be a crucial point for what occurred next. Despite "general orders forbidding a ship's captain and crew from spending the night ashore, those in charge of the transport did exactly that, leaving Smalls and his comrades aboard by themselves." Not surprisingly, the cunning Smalls leveraged this opportunity to unhatch his scheme to make off with the transport vessel, its four guns and 200 lbs. of ammunition in its cargo holds.

Smalls led the transport out of its berth in the port's Southern Wharf at 3 a.m., below the watchful eye of Confederate guards ashore. "Smalls' plan had worked perfectly... suddenly, Smalls and his crew were free." The commandeered ship surrendered itself to the Union naval blockade, and the ship was subsequently dispatched to "Port Royal to report directly to Flag Officer Du Pont himself"(Brennan 26). Smalls later "revealed that Coles Island and its batteries, the long-standing protectors of Stono Inlet and Charleston's flank, had been abandoned." Thus with this crucial information the key to Charleston's backdoor was virtually handed to the Federals.

Later that May, Gen. States Rights Gist - the overall commander of James Island - "pulled most of Colonel Stevens' 24th South Carolina off Coles Island and relocated them nearer Secessionville." By May 20th, the Union Navy began a constant reconnaissance of James Island, including sending probes up the Stono River. Having ascertained closely-guarded personnel and ordnance deployment information from Robert Smalls, what should have been a clear-cut attack plan by Federal forces under Henry Benham became contentious. A confluence of miscommunication and posturing, including several disagreements with Admiral Du Pont, exacerbated this. "In an obvious effort to squelch Benham, [Du Pont] directed his correspondence to Major General Hunter and spared no one in his sharp denunciation of Benham's ways and means." This was but the first misstep that derailed plans for a quick and easy defeat of the "cradle of secession."

Moving in to lay siege on Charleston by flanking it from the Southeast via James Island would have not only served to likely shorten the war, but additionally the takeover of Charleston Harbor would have abnegated any chances of Confederate blockade runners re-supplying the secessionists with very needed materiel, supplies and ordnance from Europe. As it would stand, this did not turn out to be the case. General Beauregard had "stated that James Island was the key to Charleston, and the Union forces realized this." As preparations were being made for the Union assault on James Island, faulty intelligence led them to believe that the Confederacy had an overstrength group in excess of 12,000 soldiers available for the Island's defense. This was patently untrue. "Realizing that the main attack [by the Federals] might be directed against the breastwork at Secessionville, General Pemberton C.S.A. instructed Brig. Gen. W.D. Smith to hold at 'any cost' the woods west of Secessionville."

THE BATTLE OF SECESSIONVILLE, SOUTH CAROLINA

At 3 A.M., June 16th, the Union forces made their attack on the Tower Battery at Secessionville, situated on a peninsula barely 125 yards wide. Surrounded by marsh on three sides, this was difficult terrain and depending upon the tidal marsh, very difficult to traverse without a readily-accessible causeway. Leading the charge for the Union forces were the elite Eighth Michigan and the Seventy-ninth New York Highlanders. On their first infantry charge, Confederate Colonel Lamar fired grape shot from a Columbiad directly into the center of the Union column, decimating the center of the leading charge of the Eighth Michigan, who were the regimental front. "Confederate troops rushed to the aid" of Col. Lamar, led by the "Pee Dee Battaltion... [and the] Charleston Battalion, led by Lt. Col. P.C. Gaillard." As Union forces advanced on them, hand-to-hand and bayonet fighting occurred heavily.

Concurrently, the "Third New Hampshire and some of the troops of the Third Rhode Island of the First Division had marched down the other peninsula, which is separated only by a small creek from the peninsula on which the battery was located." Meanwhile, the "situation on the parapet was precarious." A battalion of Louisianan troops crossed a footbridge and began to fend off the Third New Hampshire who were firing upon the rear of the Confederate artillerymen inside the earthworks. "A two-gun battery of 24-pounders was placed in front of E.M. Clark's house, later known as Battery Reed, for the purpose of enfilading an enemy attack on the breastwork at Secessionville a mile away." The U.S. Navy gunboats positioned on the Stono River were then called upon to provide more covering fire for the Union troops who were being repulsed after their first two assaults on the battery. "The gunboats Ellen and E.B. Hale, both light-draft boats," were called upon to shell from their position over a mile away. Unfortunately, without accurate spotting and the large distance between the boats and the Secessionville peninsula, the shells were said to strike "as often around Federals as Rebels".

Once the Union retreat was called, 685 men were counted as casualties from the striking force of 6,600. Because the Union forces were "not committed simultaneously, [the battle] evolved into three waves of troops," leaving brief lulls between the volleys of attack.

JAMES ISLAND DEFENSES

After sailing, rowing, and wading up the Stono River, these troops were encamped on the western shores of James Island, South Carolina, awaiting their orders to attack the "Tower Battery," as Fort Lamar was then known. This large Confederate defense site, replete with a 110-foot lookout tower, numerous artillery pieces and an enfilade position -- coupled with marsh to the North, and marsh, mud and a river to the South -- provided a very difficult fort to defeat. Moreover, with the arrival of high tide this defensive position was almost peninsular in its geography; thus the Union soldiers would have tremendous difficulty in flanking it from any direction. The Federal surveyors and engineers also did themselves a great disservice; by not properly surveiling the surrounding marshland of James Island, US forces from the 3rd New Hampshire who may have possibly altered the outcome of this decisive battle became mired in more than head-deep pluff mud and marsh grass as they tried to come to the aid of their Federal comrades-in-arms from Michigan who were being decimated by the Confederate artillery.

JAMES ALFRED MOLNAR
Graduate School of Arts & Science Wake Forest University

http://www.CharlestonBattlefields.com
http://www.CharlestonGraveyards.com
molnja7@wfu.edu

Reconstruction and the Post-Bellum South

Cunning connivance is the thought that comes to mind when uttering the phrase "conjure tales." The word "conjure" itself is rich with meaning; it conveys the idea of a deliberate falsehood when someone conjures up a tall tale. Yet within the context of "Conjure Tales," it likely takes on the meaning, "of or practicing folk magic; a conjure woman." The oft-repeated phrase spoken by Julius, to "cunjuh wuk" likely seems to reference the latter of the two definitions, but takes on a myriad of meanings -- possibly even a double entendre - as Julius refers to the work of conjurers such as Tenie or Primus, all the while conjuring up tall tales himself! These clever yet untrue tales, which are met with great delight by his employers, most often relay a message that is supposed to not only entertain, but serve as a warning (i.e., not to knock down the schoolhouse, or not to purchase the vineyard). It is usually learned quickly thereafter that there was another reason for these tales: Julius had other designs.

TO READ THE ARTICLE IN ITS ENTIRETY, PLEASE CLICK THE FOLLOWING LINK:

http://ezinearticles.com/?Reconstruction-and-the-Post-Bellum-South&id=6800340

Smallpox Variola in Colonial America

Where would the United States of America be today were it not for variola? The first military commander in chief and future first president of this incipient nation nearly lost his life - or at least came close - to the pestilential smallpox strain. Yet it was this early illness experienced by a young George Washington that helped formulate and fashion his overall military strategy as he led the various groups of volunteer militia in their fight for independence from the British. Were it not for some of these experiences, Washington may have chosen a different route and inexorably changed the course of North American history.

From the point of first contact with the Amerindians, it became quite obvious that natural immunity to variola - which was common in Europe as it spread frequently across that continent - was missing from the natives' biological and immunological makeup. This was due as well to their somewhat isolated environments. Moreover, it was recorded that variola "became more virulent in the three centuries leading up to 1800," making it even more likely that morbidity and mortality rates would be high for the Indians.

As entire Indian communities succumbed to Variola in the early epidemics, mortality stemmed not just from the pestilence itself but also from famine and thirst as the raging contagion left no one well enough to care for the ill. Furthermore, Native American healing customs may also have exacerbated the effects of variola.

TO CONTINUE READING THE FULL ARTICLE (free, no registration required), click the following link:

Article Source: http://EzineArticles.com/6801342